did not reach Long Branch until after I had left for St.Louis, and consequently is just before me for the first time.

I do not know what changes recent laws, particularly the last army bill passed, make in the relations between the general of the army and the Secretary of War.
Not having this law or other statutes here, I cannot examine the subject now, nor would I want to without consultation with the Secretary of War.

On our return to Washington I have no doubt but that the relations between the Secretary and yourself can be made pleasant, and the duties of each be so clearly defined as to leave no doubt where the authority of one leaves off and the other commences.
My own views, when commanding the army, were that orders to the army should go through the general.

No changes should be made, however, either of the location of troops or officers, without the knowledge of the Secretary of War.
In peace, the general commanded them without reporting to the Secretary farther than he chose the specific orders he gave from time to time, but subjected himself to orders from the Secretary, the latter deriving his authority to give orders from the President.

As Congress has the right, however, to make rules and regulations for the government of the army, rules made by them whether they are as they should be or not, will have to govern.