The Latin of the Roman Catholic services, therefore, is Latin in the last stage of decay.

The English of our services is English in all the vigour and suppleness of early youth.

To the great Latin writers, to Terence and Lucretius, to Cicero and Caesar, to Tacitus and Quintilian, the noblest compositions of Ambrose and Gregory would have seemed to be, not merely bad writing, but senseless gibberish, [493] The diction of our Book of Common Prayer, on the other hand, has directly or indirectly contributed to form the diction of almost every great English writer, and has extorted the admiration of the most accomplished infidels and of the most accomplished nonconformists, of such men as David Hume and Robert Hall.
The style of the Liturgy, however, did not satisfy the Doctors of the Jerusalem Chamber.

They voted the Collects too short and too dry: and Patrick was intrusted with the duty of expanding and ornamenting them.
In one respect, at least, the choice seems to have been unexceptionable; for, if we judge by the way in which Patrick paraphrased the most sublime Hebrew poetry, we shall probably be of opinion that, whether he was or was not qualified to make the collects better, no man that ever lived was more competent to make them longer, [494] It mattered little, however, whether the recommendations of the Commission were good or bad.

They were all doomed before they were known.