I am indebted to Mr.Rowley, of the United States, for having called my attention, through Mr.Brace, to the above passage of Dr.Wells' work.
The Hon.and Rev.W.Herbert, afterward Dean of Manchester, in the fourth volume of the "Horticultural Transactions", 1822, and in his work on the "Amaryllidaceae" (1837, pages 19, 339), declares that "horticultural experiments have established, beyond the possibility of refutation, that botanical species are only a higher and more permanent class of varieties." He extends the same view to animals.

The dean believes that single species of each genus were created in an originally highly plastic condition, and that these have produced, chiefly by inter-crossing, but likewise by variation, all our existing species.
In 1826 Professor Grant, in the concluding paragraph in his well-known paper ("Edinburgh Philosophical Journal", vol.XIV, page 283) on the Spongilla, clearly declares his belief that species are descended from other species, and that they become improved in the course of modification.

This same view was given in his Fifty-fifth Lecture, published in the "Lancet" in 1834.
In 1831 Mr.Patrick Matthew published his work on "Naval Timber and Arboriculture", in which he gives precisely the same view on the origin of species as that (presently to be alluded to) propounded by Mr.
Wallace and myself in the "Linnean Journal", and as that enlarged in the present volume.

Unfortunately the view was given by Mr.Matthew very briefly in scattered passages in an appendix to a work on a different subject, so that it remained unnoticed until Mr.Matthew himself drew attention to it in the "Gardeners' Chronicle", on April 7, 1860.

The differences of Mr.Matthew's views from mine are not of much importance: he seems to consider that the world was nearly depopulated at successive periods, and then restocked; and he gives as an alternative, that new forms may be generated "without the presence of any mold or germ of former aggregates." I am not sure that I understand some passages; but it seems that he attributes much influence to the direct action of the conditions of life.