The reputed author of the "New Light of Alchemy" testifies that some persons had in his own day and to his certain knowledge attained this supreme privilege.

It is not of my own seeking if in another sense I have made public the same spectacle, and thus broken with the traditions of secret science.

It would have been preferable from one point of view to have discovered Lucifer behind the mask of Masonry than to have found the conspiracy against it another _Tableau des Inconstances des Demons_ in which the _infidelite et mecreance_ connected with the old false witness, abound after a manner undreamed of by Bodin and Wierus, for it is distinctly disconcerting to think that a great church is so little honoured by her combatants and converts.
It only remains to state, and I do so with extreme reluctance, that the evidence of Signor Domenico Margiotta, which seems so strong in itself, can only be accepted, as we have seen, in connection with the credibility of Miss Vaughan, and as this has completely broken down, we cannot do otherwise than regard that part of his evidence which is concerned with Palladism as the narrative of a person who has been very seriously misled.

And I think he has otherwise shown us that he is not a judicious critic of the materials which have come into his hands.

He should never, for example, have printed his list of Palladian Lotus Lodges--so far as regards Great Britain, it is undeniably a false list.
Take that of Edinburgh as a typical instance.