Such were the contradictions and absurdities which the creed of the Secessionists inevitably involved, and in which so clever a man as Mr.Benjamin was compelled to blunder and flounder.
Pursuing his argument, Mr.Benjamin wished to know whether those who asserted that Louisiana had been bought by the United States meant that the United States had the right based on that fact to sell Louisiana?
He denied in every form that there had ever been such a purchase of Louisiana as carried with it the right of sale.
"I deny," said he, "the fact on which the argument is founded.

I deny that the Province of Louisiana or the people of Louisiana were ever conveyed to the United States for a price as property that could be bought or sold at will." However learned Mr.Benjamin may have been in the law, he was evidently ill informed as to the history of the transaction of which he spoke so confidently.

He should have known that the United States, sixteen years after it bought Louisiana from France, actually sold or exchanged a large part of that province to the King of Spain as part of the consideration in the purchase of the Floridas.

He should have known that at the time the Government of the United States disposed of a part of Louisiana, there was not an intelligent man in the world who did not recognize its right and power to dispose of the whole.

The theory that the United States acquired a less degree of sovereignty over Louisiana than was held by France when she transferred it, or by Spain when she owned it, was never dreamed of when the negotiation was made.