Next, in the fourth century come Chrysostom, Ambrose, ps.-Caesarius, the Gothic version.

After that Isidore, the Ethiopic, Cureton's Syriac.

The Harkleian, Armenian, Georgian, and other versions, with Chrysostom (2), the Opus Imperfectum, Theophylact, and Euthymius (2), bring up the rear[172].

Does any one really suppose that two Codexes of the fourth century (B[Symbol: Aleph]), which are even notorious for their many omissions and general accuracy, are any adequate set-off against such an amount of ancient evidence?
L and 33, generally the firm allies of BD and the Vulgate, forsake them at St.
Matt.vi.

13: and dispose effectually of the adverse testimony of D and Z, which are also balanced by [Symbol: Phi] and [Symbol: Sigma].