The secondary larvae give rise, similarly, to another set within them, and these again to another[171] set.
Again, the fact that in _Taenia echinococcus_ one egg produces numerous individuals, tends to invalidate the argument that the increase of segments during development is a relic of specific genesis.
Mr.H.Spencer seems to deny serial homology to the mollusca, but it is difficult to see why the shell segments of chiton are not such homologues because the segmentation is superficial.

Similarly the external processes of eolis, doris, &c., are good examples of serial homology, as also are plainly the successive chambers of the orthoceratidae.

Nor are parts of a series less serial, because arranged spirally, as in most gasteropods.

Mr.
Spencer observes of the molluscous as of the vertebrate animal, "You cannot cut it into transverse slices, each of which contains a digestive organ, a respiratory organ, a reproductive organ, &c."[172] But the same may be said of every single arthropod and annelid if it be meant that all these organs are not contained in every possible slice.

While if it be meant that parts of all such organs are contained in certain slices, then some of the mollusca may also be included.
Another objection to Mr.Spencer's speculation is derived from considerations which have already been stated, as to past time.