Mrs.Fawcett then began.
"I have before me," she said, turning over the leaves of a bulky manuscript, "a great deal of matter bearing on the question of woman's rights, which at such a meeting as this may be considered read.

It is mainly historical, and while I am prepared to meet with hostile criticism from the society, I assume that the progress our agitation has made, with its disappointments, its trials, and its triumphs, has been followed more or less carefully by you all.
"Nor shall I, after the manner of speakers on such an occasion, pay you the doubtful compliment of fulsomely extolling your aims before your face.
"I come at once to the question of woman's rights in so far as the society can affect them, and I ask of you a consideration of my case with as little prejudice as men can be expected to approach it.
"In the constitution of the society, as it has been explained to me, I notice chiefly two things which would have filled me with indignation twenty years ago, but only remind me how far we are from the goal of our ambition now.
"The first is a sin of omission, the second one of commission, and the latter is the more to be deprecated in that you made it with your eyes open, after full discussion, while the other came about as a matter of course.
"I believe I am right in saying that the membership of this society is exclusively male, and also that no absolute veto has been placed on female candidature.
"As a matter of fact, it never struck the founders that such a veto in black and white was necessary.

When they drew up the rules of membership the other sex never fell like a black shadow on the paper; it was forgotten.

We owe our eligibility to many other offices (generally disputed at law) to the same accident.

In short, the unwritten law of the _argumentum ad crinolinam_ puts us to the side." Having paid the society the compliment of believing that, however much it differed from her views, it would not dismiss them with a laugh, Mrs.Fawcett turned to the question of woman's alleged physical limitations.
She said much on this point that Andrew saw could not be easily refuted, but, interesting though she made it, we need not follow her over beaten ground.
So far the members had given her the courteous non-attention which thoughtful introductory remarks can always claim.