111) by Pinches whether these representations are not the symbols of the zodiac, but, as Belser justly remarks, the attempt to interpret the pictures in this way has not been successful.

It still seems most plausible to regard the pictures as symbols of spirits or demons.

Such an interpretation is in accord with the Babylonian and general Semitic view of land ownership.
At the same time it must be confessed that we are still in the dark as to the motives underlying the choice of the animals portrayed.

There may be some ultimate connection with _some_ of the signs of the zodiac,--so Hommel believes,--but such connection would have to be judged from the earlier forms that animism takes on, and not in the light of an advanced theology such as appears in the zodiacal system of the Babylonians.
[215] See Perrot and Chiplez, _History of Art in Chaldaea and Assyria_, I.351.
[216] The element _ki_ is sometimes omitted.

The force of _na_ is not clear, unless it be a phonetic complement merely.
[217] _Semitische Voelker_, p.