Mem._, II., ii., 482; Fortescue, ed.
Plummer, pp.

137-142.] [Footnote 21: _E.g._, _L.

and P._, i., 679.] What manner of man was this, and wherein lay the secret of his (p.

004) strength?
Is recourse necessary to a theory of supernatural agency, or is there another and adequate solution?
Was Henry's individual will of such miraculous force that he could ride roughshod in insolent pride over public opinion at home and abroad?
Or did his personal ends, dictated perhaps by selfish motives and ignoble passions, so far coincide with the interests and prejudices of the politically effective portion of his people, that they were willing to condone a violence and tyranny, the brunt of which fell after all on the few?
Such is the riddle which propounds itself to every student of Tudor history.

It cannot be answered by paeans in honour of Henry's intensity of will and force of character, nor by invectives against his vices and lamentations over the woes of his victims.