[Sophisms of the Protectionists by Frederic Bastiat]@TWC D-Link book
Sophisms of the Protectionists

PART I
23/107

Absolute perfection, of which _God_ is the type, consists in the infinite distance between these two terms in this relation, viz., effort none, result infinite.
The second system maintains that it is the effort itself which forms the measure of, and constitutes, our riches.

Progression is the increase of the _proportion of the effort to the result_.

Its ideal extreme may be represented by the eternal and fruitless efforts of Sisyphus.[7] [Footnote 7: We will therefore beg the reader to allow us in future, for the sake of conciseness, to designate this system under the term of _Sisyphism_.] The first system tends naturally to the encouragement of every thing which diminishes difficulties, and augments production,--as powerful machinery, which adds to the strength of man; the exchange of produce, which allows us to profit by the various natural agents distributed in different degrees over the surface of our globe; the intellect which discovers, experience which proves, and emulation which excites.
The second as logically inclines to every thing which can augment the difficulty and diminish the product; as privileges, monopolies, restrictions, prohibitions, suppression of machinery, sterility, etc.
It is well to remark here that the universal practice of men is always guided by the principle of the first system.

Every _workman_, whether agriculturist, manufacturer, merchant, soldier, writer or philosopher, devotes the strength of his intellect to do better, to do more quickly, more economically,--in a word, _to do more with less_.
The opposite doctrine is in use with legislators, editors, statesmen, men whose business is to make experiments upon society.

And even of these we may observe, that in what personally concerns _themselves_, they act, like every body else, upon the principle of obtaining from their labor the greatest possible quantity of useful results.
It may be supposed that I exaggerate, and that there are no true _Sisyphists_.
I grant that in practice the principle is not pushed to its extremest consequences.


<<Back  Index  Next>>

D-Link book Top

TWC mobile books