That at New Haven was after the highest type of theocracy; the Connecticut colony inclined to the less rigorous model of Plymouth, not exacting church-membership as a condition of voting.

How important this condition appeared to the mind of Davenport may be judged from his exclamation when it ceased, at the union of New Haven with Connecticut.
He wrote to a friend, "In N.H.C.Christ's interest is miserably lost;" and prepared to turn his back forever on the colony of which he was the father.
[104:1] The name, applied at first as a stigma to the liberalizing school of New England theology, may easily mislead if taken either in its earlier historic sense or in the sense which it was about to acquire in the Wesleyan revival.

The surprise of the eighteenth century New England theologians at finding the word associated with intense fervor of preaching and of religious experience is expressed in the saying, "There is all the difference between a cold Arminian and a hot Arminian that there is between a cold potato and a hot potato." For a lucid account of the subject, see W.Walker, "History of the Congregational Churches," chap.

viii.
[105:1] Sermon on "Barbarism the First Danger." [106:1] And yet, even in the Rhode Island communities, the arbitrary right of exclusion, in the exercise of which Roger Williams had been shut out from Massachusetts, was asserted and adopted.

It was forbidden to sell land to a newcomer, except by consent of prior settlers.
[107:1] Dr.J.G.Vose, "Congregationalism in Rhode Island," pp.