[The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol.I., Part E. by David Hume]@TWC D-Link book
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol.I., Part E.

CHAPTER LIV
92/95

And in the event, it has hitherto been found, that, though some sensible inconveniencies arise from the maxim of adhering strictly to law, yet the advantages overbalance them, and should render the English grateful to the memory of their ancestors, who, after repeated contests, at last established that noble, though dangerous principle.
At the request of the parliament, Charles, instead of the patents during pleasure, gave all the judges patents during their good behavior;[*] a circumstance of the greatest moment towards securing their independency, and barring the entrance of arbitrary power into the ordinary courts of judicature.
The marshal's court, which took cognizance of offensive, words, and was not thought sufficiently limited by law, was also for that reason abolished.[**] The stannary courts, which exercised jurisdiction over the miners, being liable to a like objection, underwent a like fate.

The abolition of the council of the north and the council of Wales followed from the same principles.

The authority of the clerk of the market, who had a general inspection over the weights and measures throughout the kingdom, was transferred to the mayors, sheriffs, and ordinary magistrates.
* May, p.

107.
** Nalson, vol.i p.

778.
In short, if we take a survey of the transactions of this memorable parliament during the first period of its operations, we shall find that, excepting Strafford's attainder, which was a complication of cruel iniquity, their merits in other respects so much outweigh their mistakes, as to entitle them to praise, from all lovers of liberty.
Not only were former abuses remedied, and grievances redressed; great provision for the future was made by law against the return of like complaints.


<<Back  Index  Next>>

D-Link book Top

TWC mobile books