[The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol.I., Part D. by David Hume]@TWC D-Link book
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol.I., Part D.

CHAPTER XL
37/95

All the members understood that she had been offended, because a matter had been moved which seemed to touch her prerogative.[***] Fleetwood accordingly spoke of this delicate subject.

He observed, that the queen had a prerogative of granting patents; that to question the validity of any patent was to invade the royal prerogative; that all foreign trade was entirely subjected to the pleasure of the sovereign; that even the statute which gave liberty of commerce, admitted of all prohibitions from the crown; and that the prince, when he granted an exclusive patent, only employed the power vested in him, and prohibited all others from dealing in any particular branch of commerce.

He quoted the clerk of the parliament's book to prove, that no man might speak in parliament of the statute of wills, unless the king first gave license; because the royal prerogative in the wards was thereby touched.

He showed, likewise, the statutes of Edward I., Edward III., and Henry IV., with a saving of the prerogative.

And in Edward VI.'s time, the protector was applied to for his allowance to mention matters of prerogative.[****] * D'Ewes, p.


<<Back  Index  Next>>

D-Link book Top

TWC mobile books