The earl of Arundel, who was brought to the bar, wisely confined all his defence to the pleading of both the general and particular pardon of the king; but his plea being overruled, he was condemned and executed.[**] * Cotton, p.

368.
** Cotton, p 377.

Froissard, liv.iv.chap.90.Walsing.

p.
354.
The earl of Warwick, who was also convicted of high treason, was, on account of his submissive behavior, pardoned as to his life, but doomed to perpetual banishment in the Isle of Man.

No new acts of treason were imputed to either of these noblemen.