[The Life of George Washington, Vol. 5 (of 5) by John Marshall]@TWC D-Link bookThe Life of George Washington, Vol. 5 (of 5) CHAPTER II 61/77
Although the debate shows that the degree of sensibility excited by this disorder was extremely different in the different parties, it was justified by none, and the galleries were cleared.] [Sidenote: An embargo law.] On the 21st of March, Mr.Sedgewick's motion authorizing the President to lay an embargo was negatived by a majority of two voices; but in a few days, the consideration of that subject was resumed, and a resolution passed, prohibiting all trade from the United States to any foreign port or place for the space of thirty days, and empowering the President to carry the resolution into effect. This resolution was accompanied with vigorous provisional measures for defence, respecting the adoption of which, no considerable division of sentiment was avowed. While the measures of congress indicated that expectation of war, a public document made its appearance which seemed to demonstrate that Great Britain also was preparing for that event.
This was the answer of Lord Dorchester, on the 10th of February, to a speech delivered by the deputies of a great number of Indian tribes assembled at Quebec. In this answer, his lordship had openly avowed the opinion, founded, as he said, on the conduct of the American people, that a war between Great Britain and the United States, during the present year, was probable, and that a new line between the two nations must then be drawn by the sword. This document was not authentic; but it obtained general belief, and contributed to confirm the opinion that war was scarcely to be avoided. On the 27th of March, Mr.Dayton moved a resolution for sequestering all debts due to British subjects, and for taking means to secure their payment into the treasury, as a fund out of which to indemnify the citizens of the United States for depredations committed on their commerce by British cruisers, in violation of the laws of nations. The debate on this resolution was such as was to be expected from the irritable state of the public mind.
The invectives against the British nation were uttered with peculiar vehemence, and were mingled with allusions to the exertions of the government for the preservation of neutrality, censuring strongly the system which had been pursued. Before any question was taken on the proposition for sequestering British debts, and without a decision on those proposed by Mr. Madison, Mr.Clarke moved a resolution, which in some degree suspended the commercial regulations that had been so earnestly debated.
This was to prohibit all intercourse with Great Britain until her government should make full compensation for all injuries done to the citizens of the United States by armed vessels, or by any person or persons acting under the authority of the British king; and until the western posts should be delivered up.[16] [Footnote 16: A few days before the motions of Mr.Dayton and Mr.Clarke, a report was made by the secretary of state relative to the vexations of American commerce committed by the officers and cruisers of the belligerent powers.
It was made from materials collected in an inquiry which had been instituted by the President before the meeting of congress. In this report, after detailing the numerous complaints which were made against Great Britain, the secretary proceeded to notice those which were brought against other nations.
<<Back Index Next>> D-Link book Top TWC mobile books
|