[A History of Science Volume 2(of 5) by Henry Smith Williams]@TWC D-Link bookA History of Science Volume 2(of 5) BOOK II 352/368
Winkler, shortly after this time, expressed the same belief, and, assuming that they were the same, declared that "there is no proof that they are of different natures"; and still he did not prove that they were the same nature. FRANKLIN INVENTS THE LIGHTNING-ROD Even before Franklin proved conclusively the nature of lightning, his experiments in drawing off the electric charge with points led to some practical suggestions which resulted in the invention of the lightning-rod.
In the letter of July, 1750, which he wrote on the subject, he gave careful instructions as to the way in which these rods might be constructed.
In part Franklin wrote: "May not the knowledge of this power of points be of use to mankind in preserving houses, churches, ships, etc., from the stroke of lightning by directing us to fix on the highest parts of the edifices upright rods of iron made sharp as a needle, and gilt to prevent rusting, and from the foot of these rods a wire down the outside of the building into the grounds, or down round one of the shrouds of a ship and down her side till it reaches the water? Would not these pointed rods probably draw the electrical fire silently out of a cloud before it came nigh enough to strike, and thereby secure us from that most sudden and terrible mischief? "To determine this question, whether the clouds that contain the lightning are electrified or not, I propose an experiment to be tried where it may be done conveniently.
On the top of some high tower or steeple, place a kind of sentry-box, big enough to contain a man and an electrical stand.
From the middle of the stand let an iron rod rise and pass, bending out of the door, and then upright twenty or thirty feet, pointed very sharp at the end.
<<Back Index Next>> D-Link book Top TWC mobile books
|