It is Krueger who "prolongs the negotiations," and Chamberlain who "seeks to gain time." To heighten the prestige of Mr.Krueger, Dr.Kuyper invokes the testimony of Bismarck.

I certainly think that it was Krueger's ambition to become the Bismarck of South Africa, and President of the "Africa for the Afrikanders, from the Zambesi to Simon's Bay." I come to the final act:-- On September 2nd, the Government of Pretoria withdrew its proposal to reduce the delay in granting the franchise to five years; the British Government not having accepted the conditions imposed: (1) Refusal of all enquiry into the condition of the Franchise Law by a Joint Commission; (2) Abrogation of Suzerainty in conformity with the note of the Government of Pretoria, of April 16th, 1898; (3) Refusal to submit questions under discussion to Arbitration.
[Footnote 23: _Le Siecle_, April 13th, 1900.] 2 .-- _Despatches of the 8th and 22nd September._ Mr.Chamberlain replied in his despatch of September 8th.

He was unable to accept the terms of the Note of April 16th, 1898, which he had formally refused.
He maintained that the Franchise Law was insufficient to guarantee an immediate and effective representation of the Uitlanders.
He demanded that a joint, or unilateral, Commission should be instituted to examine whether the law on the Franchise were not rendered inoperative by the conditions which would make such representations impossible.
The acceptance of these propositions by the South African Republic would put an end to the tension existing between the two Governments, and, in all probability, would render ulterior intervention on the part of Her Majesty's Government to ensure redress of the Uitlanders' grievances unnecessary, as they themselves would thenceforth be entitled to bring them directly to the cognizance of the Executive and the Raad.
Mr.Chamberlain adds that the British Government is prepared to authorise a fresh Conference between the President of the South African Republic and the High Commissioner in order to settle all details of a Tribunal of Arbitration, and the questions capable of being submitted to it on the basis of the Note of August 30th.
This very moderately worded despatch, embodying equally moderate propositions, ended as follows: "Should, however--which Her Majesty's Government earnestly trusts may not be the case--the reply of the South African Government be negative, or dilatory, it reserves to itself the right to consider the situation _de novo_, and to formulate its own propositions for a final settlement." The Government of Pretoria replied on September 16th, by referring to its Note of September 2nd.

It devotes an entire paragraph to the statement that the English language will not be admitted in the Volksraad.

It refuses to consider at that juncture the appointment of a fresh Conference; it accepts, however, the proposed Joint Commission.
Mr.Chamberlain replies in his despatch of September 22nd, in which he clearly states the attitude of the British Government.