The concession of internal independence and the reservation of the Suzerainty have but one common origin--the preamble to the Convention of 1881." Dr.Reitz succeeded Dr.Leyds as Secretary of State, and on May 9th, 1899, replied to the despatch of the preceding December 15th.

In forwarding this despatch Sir Alfred Milner observed that it contained a pretension never before put forward by the Government of Pretoria, the following words being used: "the inherent right of a Sovereign International State." Mr.Chamberlain replied, July 13th, 1899, summarising the Conventions of 1852, 1881, and 1884; he recalled Lord Derby's declaration in the House of Lords, March 17th, 1884: "Whatever Suzerainty meant in the Convention of Pretoria, the condition of things which it implies still remains.
Though the word is not actually used, we have kept the substance." [Footnote 21: _Le Siecle_, April 11th, 1900.] 2 .-- _The Suzerainty and the Conference of the Hague._ How was it that the theorists, who take up the utterance of Dr.Reitz, that: "the Transvaal has the inherent rights of a Sovereign International State," did not ask the Queen of the Netherlands that the South African Republic might be represented at the Conference of the Hague?
It was a grand opportunity, which they no more dreamt of seizing, than the thought of asking that the Bey of Tunis should take part in it.
These documents referred to by us prove that the Suzerainty Question was not raised at the last moment, as the _Temps_ of September 15th, 1899, is affirmed to have stated; that it was not raised only in 1898, as stated by Dr.Kuyper; that at least it was raised on March 6th, 1897; that, since the last mentioned date, it has given rise to an important correspondence; and, finally, that it was the first subject raised by President Krueger at the Bloemfontein Conference..