In securing young men of proper education and physique, little difficulty would be found.

Special schools could even give sufficient instruction in military and maritime subjects to enable young men to become useful in minor positions on shipboard and in camp, after a brief experience there.

In fact, for some of the positions in the army and navy, such as those in the medical corps and others, military or naval training is not needed, or exacted.
The truth of these remarks is not so obvious now as it was some years ago, and it has never been so obvious in navies as in armies; because education in the use of the numerous special appliances used in ships could be given less readily by private instruction than in the use of the simpler appliances used in armies.

But even now, and even in the navy, the course given at Annapolis is usually termed a "training" rather than an education.
Yet even education, educators tell us, is more a matter of training than a matter of imparting knowledge.

This indicates that even for the duties of civil life, the paramount aim of educators is so to train the characters of young men as to fit them for good citizenship.
We may assume, therefore, that the primary aim of governments in preparing young men for the army and navy is to develop character along the line needed for useful work in those services.
What is that line?
Probably nine officers in ten would answer this question with the words, "the line of duty." This does not mean that officers are the only people who should be trained to follow the line of duty; but it does mean that, in military and naval schools, the training is more devoted to this than in other schools, except, of course, those schools that train young men for the priesthood or other departments of the religious life.