[The Evolution of Modern Medicine by William Osler]@TWC D-Link book
The Evolution of Modern Medicine

CHAPTER IV -- THE RENAISSANCE AND THE RISE OF ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY
22/75

213).
Paracelsus expresses the healing powers of nature by the word "mumia," which he regarded as a sort of magnetic influence or force, and he believed that anyone possessing this could arrest or heal disease in others.

As the lily breaks forth in invisible perfume, so healing influences may pass from an invisible body.

Upon these views of Paracelsus was based the theory of the sympathetic cure of disease which had an extraordinary vogue in the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and which is not without its modern counterpart.
In the next century, in Van Helmont we meet with the Archaeus everywhere presiding, controlling and regulating the animate and inanimate bodies, working this time through agents, local ferments.

The Rosicrucians had their direct inspiration from his writings, and such mystics as the English Rosicrucian Fludd were strong Paracelsians.( 14) (14) Robert Fludd, the Mystical Physician, British Medical Journal, London, 1897, ii, 408.
The doctrine of contraries drawn from the old Greek philosophy, upon which a good deal of the treatment of Hippocrates and Galen was based--dryness expelled by moisture, cold by heat, etc .-- was opposed by Paracelsus in favor of a theory of similars, upon which the practice of homeopathy is based.

This really arose from the primitive beliefs, to which I have already referred as leading to the use of eyebright in diseases of the eye, and cyclamen in diseases of the ear because of its resemblance to that part; and the Egyptian organotherapy had the same basis,--spleen would cure spleen, heart, heart, etc.


<<Back  Index  Next>>

D-Link book Top

TWC mobile books