Such giving only serves to dry up the natural springs of charity.
It is highly important that every charitable institution shall have at all times the largest possible number of current contributors.

This means that the institution shall constantly be making its appeals; but, if these constant appeals are to be successful, the institution is forced to do excellent work and meet real and manifest needs.
Moreover, the interest of many people affords the best assurance of wise economy and unselfish management as well as of continued support.
We frequently make our gifts conditional on the giving of others, not because we wish to force people to do their duty, but because we wish in this way to root the institution in the affections of as many people as possible who, as contributors, become personally concerned, and thereafter may be counted on to give to the institution their watchful interest and cooeperation.

Conditional gifts are often criticized, and sometimes, it may be, by people who have not thought the matter out fully.
Criticism which is deliberate, sober, and fair is always valuable and it should be welcomed by all who desire progress.

I have had at least my full share of adverse criticism, but I can truly say that it has not embittered me, nor left me with any harsh feeling against a living soul.

Nor do I wish to be critical of those whose conscientious judgment, frankly expressed, differs from my own.