[Oscar Wilde, Volume 1 (of 2) by Frank Harris]@TWC D-Link bookOscar Wilde, Volume 1 (of 2) CHAPTER I 1/22
On the 12th of December, 1864, Dublin society was abuzz with excitement.
A tidbit of scandal which had long been rolled on the tongue in semi-privacy was to be discussed in open court, and all women and a good many men were agog with curiosity and expectation. The story itself was highly spiced and all the actors in it well known. A famous doctor and oculist, recently knighted for his achievements, was the real defendant.
He was married to a woman with a great literary reputation as a poet and writer who was idolized by the populace for her passionate advocacy of Ireland's claim to self-government; "Speranza" was regarded by the Irish people as a sort of Irish Muse. The young lady bringing the action was the daughter of the professor of medical jurisprudence at Trinity College, who was also the chief at Marsh's library. It was said that this Miss Travers, a pretty girl just out of her teens, had been seduced by Dr.Sir William Wilde while under his care as a patient.
Some went so far as to say that chloroform had been used, and that the girl had been violated. The doctor was represented as a sort of Minotaur: lustful stories were invented and repeated with breathless delight; on all faces, the joy of malicious curiosity and envious denigration. The interest taken in the case was extraordinary: the excitement beyond comparison; the first talents of the Bar were engaged on both sides; Serjeant Armstrong led for the plaintiff, helped by the famous Mr.Butt, Q.C., and Mr.Heron, Q.C., who were in turn backed by Mr. Hamill and Mr.Quinn; while Serjeant Sullivan was for the defendant, supported by Mr.Sidney, Q.C., and Mr.Morris, Q.C., and aided by Mr. John Curran and Mr.Purcell. The Court of Common Pleas was the stage; Chief Justice Monahan presiding with a special jury.
The trial was expected to last a week, and not only the Court but the approaches to it were crowded. To judge by the scandalous reports, the case should have been a criminal case, should have been conducted by the Attorney-General against Sir William Wilde; but that was not the way it presented itself.
<<Back Index Next>> D-Link book Top TWC mobile books
|