[Oscar Wilde, Volume 1 (of 2) by Frank Harris]@TWC D-Link bookOscar Wilde, Volume 1 (of 2) CHAPTER XV 17/44
Later in the trial, however, Mr.Gill himself withdrew the charges of conspiracy, and the Judge admitted explicitly in his summing up that, if he had known the evidence which was to be offered, he would not have allowed these charges of conspiracy to be made.
By this confession he apparently cleared his conscience just as Pilate washed his hands.
But the wrong had already been done.
Not only did this charge of conspiracy embarrass the defence, but if it had never been made, as it should never have been made, then Sir Edward Clarke would have insisted and could have insisted properly that the two men should be tried separately, and Wilde would not have been discredited by being coupled with Taylor, whose character was notorious and who had already been in the hands of the police on a similar charge. This was not the only instance of unfairness in the conduct of the prosecution.
The Treasury put a youth called Atkins in the box, thus declaring him to be at least a credible witness; but Atkins was proved by Sir Edward Clarke to have perjured himself in the court in the most barefaced way.
<<Back Index Next>> D-Link book Top TWC mobile books
|