He came on an errand of mercy to the world, and he was all powerful to accomplish the Divine intent; but, did he emancipate the slave?
The happiness of the human race was the object of his coming; and is it possible that the large portion of them then slaves could have escaped his all-seeing eye! Did he condemn the institution which he had made?
Did he establish universal freedom?
Oh! no; he came to redeem the world from the power of sin; his was no earthly mission; he did not interfere with the organization of society.

He healed the sick servant of the centurion, but he did not command his freedom; nor is there a word that fell from his sacred lips that could be construed into a condemnation of that institution which had existed from the early ages of the world, existed then, and is continued now.

The application made by the Abolitionist of the golden rule is absurd: it might then apply to the child, who _would have_ his father no longer control him; to the apprentice, who _would_ no longer that the man to whom he is bound should have a right to direct him.

Thus the foundations of society would be shaken, nay, destroyed.

Christ would have us deal with others, not as they desire, but as the law of God demands: in the condition of life in which we have been placed, we must do what we conscientiously believe to be our duty to our fellow-men.
Christ alludes to slavery, but does not forbid it.