Is not this proposition even more fatal than the former to the attributes conferred on God by human reason?
How can the actual condition of Matter be explained if we suppose it to issue from the bosom of God and to be ever united with Him?
Is it possible to believe that the All-Powerful, supremely good in His essence and in His faculties, has engendered things dissimilar to Himself.

Must He not in all things and through all things be like unto Himself?
Can there be in God certain evil parts of which at some future day he may rid Himself ?--a conjecture less offensive and absurd than terrible, for the reason that it drags back into Him the two principles which the preceding theory proved to be inadmissible.

God must be ONE; He cannot be divided without renouncing the most important condition of His existence.

It is therefore impossible to admit of a fraction of God which yet is not God.

This hypothesis seemed so criminal to the Roman Church that she has made the omnipresence of God in the least particles of the Eucharist an article of faith.
"But how then can we imagine an omnipotent mind which does not triumph?
How associate it unless in triumph with Nature?
But Nature is not triumphant; she seeks, combines, remodels, dies, and is born again; she is even more convulsed when creating than when all was fusion; Nature suffers, groans, is ignorant, degenerates, does evil; deceives herself, annihilates herself, disappears, and begins again.