Here is one which, placed beside it, proves him to have been a man.
"_Whosoever shall confess me before men, him shall the son of man also confess before the angels of God_; "_but whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my father, which is in heaven._" Is it God speaking--or man?
"_Do not even the publicans so ?_" Beside this very human contradiction, it is hardly worth while to hear him say "Resist not evil," yet make a scourge of cords to drive the money-changers from the temple in a fit of rage, human--but how ungodlike! Believe me, the man Jesus is better than the god Jesus; the man is worth while, for all his inconsistencies, partly due to his creed and partly to his emotional nature.

Indeed, we have not yet risen to the splendour of his ideal--even the preachers will not preach it.
And the miracles?
We need say nothing of those, I think.

If a man disprove his godship out of his own mouth, we shall not be convinced by a coin in a fish's mouth or by his raising Lazarus, four days dead.

So long as he says, "I will confess him that confesseth me and deny him that denieth me," we should know him for one of us, though he rose from the dead before our eyes.
Then at the last you will say, "By their fruits ye shall know them." Well, sir, the fruits of Christianity are what one might expect.

You will say it stands for the fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man.