I note that change for it is significant of the ways in which we modify the traditions of the past, not quite abandoning them but pretending that they have other than the fundamental original motives.

We see just the same thing in the use of the ring, which was in the first place a part of the bride-price, frequently accompanied by money, proof that the wife had been duly purchased.

It was thus made easy to regard the ring as really a golden fetter.

That idea soon became offensive, and the new idea was originated that the ring was a pledge of affection; thus, quite early in some countries, the husband, also wore a wedding ring.
The marriage order illustrated by the _Paston Letters_ and the _Book of the Chevalier de la Tour-Landry_ before the Reformation, and the Anglican Book of Common Prayer afterwards, has never been definitely broken; it is a part of our living tradition to-day.

But during recent centuries it has been overlaid by the growth of new fashions and sentiments which have softened its hard outlines to the view.