The others claimed that a large manufacturing concern has ceased to be a private matter; that not only a number of workmen and stockholders are concerned in its management, but that the interests of the public are so involved that the officers of the company are in a real sense administering a public trust.
This prolonged strike clearly puts in a concrete form the ethics of an individual, in this case a benevolent employer, and the ethics of a mass of men, his employees, claiming what they believed to be their moral rights.
These events illustrate the difficulty of managing an industry which has become organized into a vast social operation, not with the cooeperation of the workman thus socialized, but solely by the dictation of the individual owning the capital.

There is a sharp divergence between the social form and the individual aim, which becomes greater as the employees are more highly socialized and dependent.

The president of the company under discussion went further than the usual employer does.

He socialized not only the factory, but the form in which his workmen were living.

He built, and in a great measure regulated, an entire town, without calling upon the workmen either for self-expression or self-government.