On the contrary, he is in manner, bearing, and spirit a true mystic, a man of silence and meditation, gentle when he is not angered, modest when he is not challenged by a fool, humble in his attitude to God if not to a foolish world, and, albeit with the awkwardness inevitable in one who lives so habitually with his own thoughts and his own silence, anxious to be polite.
"I do not like being unpleasant," he said to me on one occasion, "but if no one else will, and the time requires it--" It is a habit with him to leave a sentence unfinished which is sufficiently clear soon after the start.
In what way is he unpleasant?
and what are those movements of the time which call in his judgment for unpleasantness?
Of Bergson he said to me, "I hope he is still thinking," and when I questioned him he replied that Bergson's teaching up to this moment "suggests that anything may happen." Here you may see one of the main movements of our day which call, in the Dean's judgment for unpleasantness--the unpleasantness of telling people not to make fools of themselves.

Humanity must not go over in a body to Mr.Micawber.
Anything may happen?
No! We are not characters in a fairy tale, but men of reason, inhabiting a world which reveals to us at every point of our investigation one certain and unalterable fact--an unbroken uniformity of natural law.

We must not dream; we must act, and, before we act, we must think.

Human nature does not change very greatly.

Bergson is apt to encourage easy optimism, to leave the door open for credulity, superstition, idle expectation; and he is disposed to set instinct above reason, "a very dangerous doctrine, at any rate for _this_ generation." What is wrong with this generation?
It is a generation that refuses to accept the rule and discipline of reason, which thinks it can reach millennium by a short cut, or jump to the moon in an excess of emotional fervour.