But exiles are deprived of their property! What, then! has there not been enough said on bearing poverty?
But with regard to banishment, if we examine the nature of things, not the ignominy of the name, how little does it differ from constant travelling! in which some of the most famous philosophers have spent their whole life, as Xenocrates, Crantor, Arcesilas, Lacydes, Aristotle, Theophrastus, Zeno, Cleanthes, Chrysippus, Antipater, Carneades, Panaetius, Clitomachus, Philo, Antiochus, Posidonius, and innumerable others, who from their first setting-out never returned home again.

Now, what ignominy can a wise man be affected with (for it is of such a one that I am speaking) who can be guilty of nothing which deserves it?
for there is no occasion to comfort one who is banished for his deserts.

Lastly, they can easily reconcile themselves to every accident who measure all their objects and pursuits in life by the standard of pleasure; so that in whatever place that is supplied, there they may live happily.

Thus what Teucer said may be applied to every case: "Wherever I am happy is my country." Socrates, indeed, when he was asked where he belonged to, replied, "The world;" for he looked upon himself as a citizen and inhabitant of the whole world.

How was it with T.Altibutius?
Did he not follow his philosophical studies with the greatest satisfaction at Athens, although he was banished?
which, however, would not have happened to him if he had obeyed the laws of Epicurus and lived peaceably in the republic.