Shall musicians compose their tunes to their own tastes?
and shall a philosopher, master of a much better art, seek to ascertain, not what is most true, but what will please the people?
Can anything be more absurd than to despise the vulgar as mere unpolished mechanics, taken singly, and to think them of consequence when collected into a body?
These wise men would contemn our ambitious pursuits and our vanities, and would reject all the honors which the people could voluntarily offer to them; but we know not how to despise them till we begin to repent of having accepted them.

There is an anecdote related by Heraclitus, the natural philosopher, of Hermodorus, the chief of the Ephesians, that he said "that all the Ephesians ought to be punished with death for saying, when they had expelled Hermodorus out of their city, that they would have no one among them better than another; but that if there were any such, he might go elsewhere to some other people." Is not this the case with the people everywhere?
Do they not hate every virtue that distinguishes itself?
What! was not Aristides (I had rather instance in the Greeks than ourselves) banished his country for being eminently just?
What troubles, then, are they free from who have no connection whatever with the people?
What is more agreeable than a learned retirement?
I speak of that learning which makes us acquainted with the boundless extent of nature and the universe, and which even while we remain in this world discovers to us both heaven, earth, and sea.
XXXVII.

If, then, honor and riches have no value, what is there else to be afraid of?
Banishment, I suppose; which is looked on as the greatest evil.

Now, if the evil of banishment proceeds not from ourselves, but from the froward disposition of the people, I have just now declared how contemptible it is.

But if to leave one's country be miserable, the provinces are full of miserable men, very few of the settlers in which ever return to their country again.