[Political Thought in England from Locke to Bentham by Harold J. Laski]@TWC D-Link book
Political Thought in England from Locke to Bentham

CHAPTER III
13/61

The schism, in this view, was the fault of those who remained subject to William's dominion.

The Nonjurors had not changed; and they were preserving the Church in its integrity from men who strove to betray it to the civil power.
This matter of integrity is important.

The glamour of Macaulay has somewhat softened the situation of those who took the oaths; and in his pages the Nonjurors appear as stupid men unworthily defending a dead cause.

It is worth while to note that this is the merest travesty.
Tillotson, who succeeded Sancroft on the latter's deprivation, and Burnet himself had urged passive resistance upon Lord William Russell as essential to salvation; Tenison had done likewise at the execution of Monmouth.

Stillingfleet, Patrick, White Kennett, had all written in its favor; and to William Sherlock belongs the privilege of having defended and attacked it in two pamphlets each of which challenges the pithy brilliance of the other.


<<Back  Index  Next>>

D-Link book Top

TWC mobile books