If slavery was ordained of God to the Hebrews, it must, therefore, have been benevolent.

If we start with the doctrine that 'Slavery is the sum of all villanies,' no wonder that we find it necessary to use extenuating words and a sort of apologetic, protecting manner of treating the divine oracles.

After all it is evidently hard work, with many anti-slavery men to maintain that reverence for the Old Testament and that confidence in God which they feel are required of them.

So they lay all the responsibility of imperfection in the divine conduct, to the 'semi-barbarous Hebrews!'-- a people by the way, whose first leader combined in himself a greater variety, and a higher order, of talent, than any other man in history.
As military commander, poet, historian, judge, legislator, who is to be named in comparison with the man Moses?
"We must come to the conclusion," said I, "that the relation of ownership is not only not sinful, but that it is in itself benevolent, that it had a benevolent object; for its origin was certainly benevolent." "What was its origin ?" said Mrs.North; "I always had a desire to know how slavery first came into existence." "Blackstone tells us," I replied, "that its origin was in the right of a captor to commute the death of his captives with bondage.

The laws of war give the conqueror a right to destroy his enemies; if he sees fit to spare their lives in consideration of their serving him, this is also his right.