_David Simple_ (1744), her best known work, the _Familiar Letters_ connected with it (to which Henry contributed), and _The Governess_ display both the merit and the defect--but the defect is more fatal to a novel than the merit is advantageous.

Once more--if the criticism has been repeated _ad nauseam_ the occasions of it may be warranted to be much more nauseous in themselves--one looks up for interest, and is not fed.

"The Adventures" of David--whose progeny must have been rapidly enriched and ennobled if Peter Simple was his descendant--were "in search of a Friend," and he came upon nobody in the least like O'Brien.

It was, in fact, too early or too late for a _lady_ to write a thoroughly good novel.

It had been possible in the days of Madeleine de Scudery, and it became possible in the days of Frances Burney: but for some time before, in the days of Sarah Fielding, it was only possible in the ways of Afra and of Mrs.Haywood, who, without any unjust stigma on them, can hardly be said to fulfil the idea of ladyhood, as no doubt Miss Fielding did.
There is an amusing and (in its context) just passage of Thackeray's, in which he calls Charlotte Lennox, author of _The Female Quixote_ (1752), a "figment." But it would be unlucky if any one were thereby prevented from reading this work of the lady whom Johnson admired, and for whom he made an all-night orgie of apple-pie and bay-leaves.