See the last two letters of this section.

See also Appendix A in F.E.Smith and N.W.

Sibley's _International Law in the Russo-Chinese War_ (1905), devoted to a consideration of those criticisms.
THE BRITISH PROCLAMATION OF NEUTRALITY Sir,--You were good enough to insert in your issue of November 9 some observations which I had addressed to you upon the essential difference between carriage of contraband, which takes place at the risk of the neutral shipowner, and use of neutral territory as a base for belligerent operations, an act which may implicate the neutral Power internationally, while also rendering the shipper liable to penal proceedings on the part of his own Government.

I am gratified, to find that the views thus expressed by me are in exact accordance with those set forth by Lord Lansdowne in his reply of November 25 to the Chamber of Shipping of the United Kingdom.

Perhaps you will allow me to say something further upon the same subject, suggested by several letters which appear in your paper of this morning.