[Ulster’s Stand For Union by Ronald McNeill]@TWC D-Link bookUlster’s Stand For Union CHAPTER XIV 2/11
(afterwards Home Secretary, and ultimately Lord of Appeal), suggested that the King might "exercise his undoubted right" to dissolve Parliament before the beginning of the next session, in order to inform himself as to whether the policy of his Ministers was endorsed by the people. But a much greater sensation was created a few days later by a letter which appeared in _The Times_ on the 11th of the same month over the signature of Lord Loreburn.
Lord Loreburn had been Lord Chancellor at the time the Home Rule Bill was first introduced, but had retired from the Government in June 1912, being replaced on the Woolsack by Lord Haldane.
When the first draft of the Home Rule Bill was under discussion in the Cabinet in preparation for its introduction in the House of Commons, two of the younger Ministers, Mr.Lloyd George and Mr.Winston Churchill, proposed that an attempt should be made to avert the stern opposition to be expected from Ulster, by treating the northern Province, or a portion of it, separately from the rest of Ireland.
This proposal was not acceptable to the Cabinet as a whole, and its authors were roundly rated by Lord Loreburn for so unprincipled a lapse from orthodox Gladstonian doctrine.
What, therefore, must have been the astonishment of the heretics when they found their mentor, less than two years later, publicly reproving the Government which he had left for having got into such a sad mess over the Ulster difficulty! They might be forgiven some indignation at finding themselves reproved by Lord Loreburn for faulty statesmanship of which Lord Loreburn was the principal author. Those, however, who had not the same ground for exasperation as Mr. Lloyd George and Mr.Churchill thought Lord Loreburn's letter very sound sense.
<<Back Index Next>> D-Link book Top TWC mobile books
|