[History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science by John William Draper]@TWC D-Link bookHistory of the Conflict Between Religion and Science CHAPTER VIII 1/37
CHAPTER VIII. CONFLICT RESPECTING THE CRITERION OF TRUTH. Ancient philosophy declares that man has no means of ascertaining the truth. Differences of belief arise among the early Christians--An ineffectual attempt is made to remedy them by Councils .-- Miracle and ordeal proof introduced. The papacy resorts to auricular confession and the Inquisition .-- It perpetrates frightful atrocities for the suppression of differences of opinion. Effect of the discovery of the Pandects of Justinian and development of the canon law on the nature of evidence .-- It becomes more scientific. The Reformation establishes the rights of individual reason .-- Catholicism asserts that the criterion of truth is in the Church.
It restrains the reading of books by the Index Expurgatorius, and combats dissent by such means as the massacre of St.Bartholomew's Eve. Examination of the authenticity of the Pentateuch as the Protestant criterion .-- Spurious character of those books. For Science the criterion of truth is to be found in the revelations of Nature: for the Protestant, it is in the Scriptures; for the Catholic, in an infallible Pope. "WHAT is truth ?" was the passionate demand of a Roman procurator on one of the most momentous occasions in history.
And the Divine Person who stood before him, to whom the interrogation was addressed, made no reply--unless, indeed, silence contained the reply. Often and vainly had that demand been made before--often and vainly has it been made since.
No one has yet given a satisfactory answer. When, at the dawn of science in Greece, the ancient religion was disappearing like a mist at sunrise, the pious and thoughtful men of that country were thrown into a condition of intellectual despair. Anaxagoras plaintively exclaims, "Nothing can be known, nothing can be learned, nothing can be certain, sense is limited, intellect is weak, life is short." Xenophanes tells us that it is impossible for us to be certain even when we utter the truth.
Parmenides declares that the very constitution of man prevents him from ascertaining absolute truth. Empedocles affirms that all philosophical and religious systems must be unreliable, because we have no criterion by which to test them. Democritus asserts that even things that are true cannot impart certainty to us; that the final result of human inquiry is the discovery that man is incapable of absolute knowledge; that, even if the truth be in his possession, he cannot be certain of it.
<<Back Index Next>> D-Link book Top TWC mobile books
|