.

.

'The great difficulty in respect to "The Review" {320b} seems to be to settle a basis, inclusive and exclusive; in short, a boundary question.

From what you said, I think you agreed with me, that a latitudinarian Christianity ought to be the character of the periodical; but the depth of the roots should correspond with the width of the branches of that tree of knowledge.

Of some of those minds one might say, "They have no root;" and then, the richer the foliage, the more danger that the trunk will fall.