[John Knox and the Reformation by Andrew Lang]@TWC D-Link book
John Knox and the Reformation

CHAPTER XI: KNOX'S INTRIGUES, AND HIS ACCOUNT OF THEM, 1559
27/43

{143a} These articles make no provision for the safety of Catholic priests and churches, and insist on suppression of idolatry where it has been put down, and the entire withdrawal of French forces.

Knox's party could not possibly denounce these terms which they demanded as "things unreasonable and ungodly," for they were the very terms which they had been asking for, ever since the Regent went to Dunbar.

Yet, when the treaty was made, the preachers did say "our case is not yet so desperate that we need to grant to things unreasonable and ungodly." {143b} Manifestly, therefore, the terms actually obtained, as being "unreasonable and ungodly," were _not_ those for which the Reformers asked, and which, _they publicly proclaimed_, had been conceded.
Knox writes, "These our articles were altered, and another form disposeth." And here he translates the terms as given in the French, terms which provide for the safety of Catholics, the surrender of Holyrood and the Mint, but say nothing about the withdrawal of the French troops or the non-restoration of "idolatry" where it has been suppressed.
He adds, "This alteration in words and order was made" (so it actually _was_ made) "without the knowledge and consent of those whose counsel we had used in all cases before"-- clearly meaning the preachers, and also implying that the consent of the noble negotiators for the Congregation _was_ obtained to the French articles.
Next day the Congregation left Edinburgh, after making solemn proclamation of the conditions of truce, in which they omitted all the terms of the French version, except those in their own favour, and stated (in Knox's version) that all of their own terms, except the most important, namely, the removal of the French, and the promise to bring in no more, had been granted! It may be by accident, however, that the proclamation of the Lords, as given by Knox, omits the article securing the departure of the French.

{144a} There exist two MS.

copies of the proclamation, in which the Lords dare to assert "that the Frenchmen should be sent away at a reasonable date, and no more brought in except by assent of the whole nobility and Parliament." {144b} Of the terms really settled, except as regards the immunity of their own party, the Lords told the public not one word; they suppressed what was true, and added what was false.
Against this formal, public, and impudent piece of mendacity, we might expect Knox to protest in his "History"; to denounce it as a cause of God's wrath.


<<Back  Index  Next>>

D-Link book Top

TWC mobile books