I have read Dr.
Campbell's dissertation on the difference, in his Philosophy of Rhetoric; I have read Sydney Smith's own two lectures; but I confess I am not much the wiser.

Professors of rhetoric, no doubt, must have such discussions; but when you wish to be amused by the thing itself, it is somewhat disappointing to be presented with metaphysical analysis.

It is like instituting an examination of the glass and cork of a champagne bottle, and a chemical testing of the wine.

In the very process the volatile and sparkling draught which was to delight the palate has become like ditch water, vapid and dead.

What I mean is, that, call it wit or humour, or what you please, there is a school of Scottish pleasantry, amusing and characteristic beyond all other.