For example: On the subject of the _numbers_, he attempted but one definition, and that is a fourfold solecism.

Ho speaks of the _persons_, but gives neither definitions nor explanations.

In treating of the _genders_, he gives but one formal definition.

His section on the _cases_ contains no regular definition.

On the _comparison_ of adjectives, and on the _moods_ and _tenses_ of verbs, he is also satisfied with a very loose mode of teaching.