Now how can the Son's being conscious that the Father is conscious that he is not the Son, constitute a numerical unity?
And wherein can such a consciousness as that attributed to the Son differ from absolute certainty?
Is not God conscious of every thought of man;--and would Sherlock allow me to deduce the unity of the divine consciousness with the human?
Sherlock's is doubtless a very plain and intelligible account of three Gods in the most absolute intimacy with each other, so that they are all as one; but by no means of three persons that are one God.

I do not wonder that Waterland and the other followers of Bull were alarmed.
Ib.p.

72.
Even among men it is only knowledge that is power.

Human power, and human knowledge, as that signifies a knowledge how to do anything, are commensurate; whatever human skill extends to, human power can effect: nay, every man can do what he knows how to do, if he has proper instruments and materials to do it with.
This proves that perfect knowledge supposes perfect power: and that they are one and the same.

"If he have proper instruments:"-- does not this show that the means are supposed co-present with the knowledge, not the same with it?
Ib.
For it is nothing but thought which moves our bodies, and all the members of them, which are the immediate instruments of all human force and power: excepting mechanical motions which do not depend upon our wills, such as the motion of the heart, the circulation of the blood, the concoction of our meat and the like.