That it is out of use is a presumptive argument that it ought to remain out of use: good reasons must be at hand to support its reappearance.

I must not, however, enlarge upon this wide-reaching question; for of the two portions of Spenser's verse which I shall quote, one of them is not at all, the other not so much as his great poem, affected with this whim.
The first I give is a sonnet, one of eighty-eight which he wrote to his wife before their marriage.

Apparently disappointed in early youth, he did not fall in love again,--at least there is no sign of it that I know,--till he was middle-aged.

But then--woman was never more grandly wooed than was his Elizabeth.

I know of no marriage-present worthy to be compared with the Epithalamion which he gave her "in lieu of many ornaments,"-- one of the most stately, melodious, and tender poems in the world, I fully believe.
But now for the sonnet--the sixty-eighth of the _Amoretti_: Most glorious Lord of Life! that, on this day, Didst make thy triumph over death and sin, And having harrowed hell, didst bring away Captivity thence captive, us to win: This joyous day, dear Lord, with joy begin; And grant that we, for whom thou diddest die, Being with thy dear blood clean washed from sin, May live for ever in felicity! And that thy love we weighing worthily, May likewise love thee for the same again; And for thy sake, that all like dear didst buy, With love may one another entertain.
So let us love, dear love, like as we ought: Love is the lesson which the Lord us taught.
Those who have never felt the need of the divine, entering by the channel of will and choice and prayer, for the upholding, purifying, and glorifying of that which itself first created human, will consider this poem untrue, having its origin in religious affectation.