Gentlemen, there was the sound of voices in the front room, and--' 'And you listened, I believe, Mrs.Cluppins ?' said Serjeant Buzfuz.
'Beggin' your pardon, Sir,' replied Mrs.Cluppins, in a majestic manner, 'I would scorn the haction.

The voices was very loud, Sir, and forced themselves upon my ear.' 'Well, Mrs.Cluppins, you were not listening, but you heard the voices.
Was one of those voices Pickwick's ?' 'Yes, it were, Sir.' And Mrs.Cluppins, after distinctly stating that Mr.Pickwick addressed himself to Mrs.Bardell, repeated by slow degrees, and by dint of many questions, the conversation with which our readers are already acquainted.
The jury looked suspicious, and Mr.Serjeant Buzfuz smiled as he sat down.

They looked positively awful when Serjeant Snubbin intimated that he should not cross-examine the witness, for Mr.Pickwick wished it to be distinctly stated that it was due to her to say, that her account was in substance correct.
Mrs.Cluppins having once broken the ice, thought it a favourable opportunity for entering into a short dissertation on her own domestic affairs; so she straightway proceeded to inform the court that she was the mother of eight children at that present speaking, and that she entertained confident expectations of presenting Mr.Cluppins with a ninth, somewhere about that day six months.

At this interesting point, the little judge interposed most irascibly; and the effect of the interposition was, that both the worthy lady and Mrs.Sanders were politely taken out of court, under the escort of Mr.Jackson, without further parley.
'Nathaniel Winkle!' said Mr.Skimpin.
'Here!' replied a feeble voice.

Mr.Winkle entered the witness-box, and having been duly sworn, bowed to the judge with considerable deference.
'Don't look at me, Sir,' said the judge sharply, in acknowledgment of the salute; 'look at the jury.' Mr.Winkle obeyed the mandate, and looked at the place where he thought it most probable the jury might be; for seeing anything in his then state of intellectual complication was wholly out of the question.
Mr.Winkle was then examined by Mr.Skimpin, who, being a promising young man of two or three-and-forty, was of course anxious to confuse a witness who was notoriously predisposed in favour of the other side, as much as he could.
'Now, Sir,' said Mr.Skimpin, 'have the goodness to let his Lordship know what your name is, will you ?' and Mr.Skimpin inclined his head on one side to listen with great sharpness to the answer, and glanced at the jury meanwhile, as if to imply that he rather expected Mr.Winkle's natural taste for perjury would induce him to give some name which did not belong to him.
'Winkle,' replied the witness.
'What's your Christian name, Sir ?' angrily inquired the little judge.
'Nathaniel, Sir.' 'Daniel--any other name ?' 'Nathaniel, sir--my Lord, I mean.' 'Nathaniel Daniel, or Daniel Nathaniel ?' 'No, my Lord, only Nathaniel--not Daniel at all.' 'What did you tell me it was Daniel for, then, sir ?' inquired the judge.
'I didn't, my Lord,' replied Mr.Winkle.
'You did, Sir,' replied the judge, with a severe frown.