Let us try this tall Englishman." So the case was opened against Peter by a public prosecutor, who restated it as it had been laid before the queen.

The Captain Arrano gave his evidence as to the killing of the soldier, but, in cross-examination by Peter's advocate, admitted, for evidently he bore no malice against the prisoner, that the said soldier had roughly handled the Dona Margaret, and that the said Peter, being a stranger to the country, might very well have taken them for a troop of bandits or even Moors.

Also, he added, that he could not say that the Englishman had intended to kill the soldier.
Then Castell and Margaret gave their evidence, the latter with much modest sweetness.

Indeed, when she explained that Peter was her affianced husband, to whom she was to have been wed on the day after she had been stolen away from England, and that she had cried out to him for help when the dead soldier caught hold of her and rent away her veil, there was a murmur of sympathy, and the king and queen began to talk with each other without paying much heed to her further words.
Next they spoke to two of the judges who sat with them, after which the king held up his hand and announced that they had come to a decision on the case.

It was, that, under the circumstances, the Englishman was justified in cutting down the soldier, especially as there was nothing to show that he meant to kill him, or that he knew that he belonged to the Holy Hermandad.