Thus, who are they that derive from fiction and literature a prejudicial effect?
We have seen already--the light and superficial;--but who are they that derive profit from them ?--they who enjoy well regulated and discerning minds.

Who pleasure ?--all mankind! Would it not therefore be better, instead of depriving some of profit, and all of pleasure, by banishing poetry and fiction from our Utopia, to correct the minds which find evil, where, if they were properly instructed, they would find good?
Whether we agree with Helvetius, that all men are born with an equal capacity of improvement, or merely go the length with all other metaphysicians, that education can improve the human mind to an extent yet incalculable, it must be quite clear, that we can give sound views instead of fallacies, and make common truths as easy to discern and adopt as common errors.

But if we effect this, which we all allow is so easy, with our children; if we strengthen their minds, instead of weakening them, and clear their vision, rather than confuse it, from that moment, we remove the prejudicial effects of fiction, and just as we have taught them to use a knife, without cutting their fingers, we teach them to make use of fiction without perverting it to their prejudice.

What philosopher was ever hurt by reading the novels of Crebillon, or seeing the comedies of Moliere?
You understand me, then, Monsieur de G., I do, it is true, think that polite literature (as it is termed,) is prejudicial to the superficial, but for that reason, I would not do away with the literature, I would do away with the superficial." "I deny," said M.D'A--, "that this is so easy a task--you cannot make all men wise." "No," replied Vincent; "but you can all children, at least to a certain extent.

Since you cannot deny the prodigious effects of education, you must allow that they will, at least, give common sense; for it they cannot do this, they can do nothing.