THE TRIAL Although it took place so long ago, I suppose that a good many people still remember the case of "The Queen _versus_ Therne," which attracted a great deal of attention at the time.

The prosecution, as I have said, was set on foot by the relations of the deceased Lady Colford, who, being very rich and powerful people, were able to secure the advocacy of one of the most eminent criminal lawyers of the day, with whom were briefed sundry almost equally eminent juniors.

Indeed no trouble or expense was spared that could help to ensure my conviction.
On my behalf also appeared a well-known Q.C., and with him two juniors.
The judge who tried the case was old and experienced but had the reputation of being severe, and from its very commencement I could see that the perusal of the depositions taken in the magistrates' court, where it will be remembered I was not defended, had undoubtedly biased his mind against me.

As for the jury, they were a respectable-looking quiet set of men, who might be relied upon to do justice according to their lights.

Of those who were called from the panel and answered to their names two, by the way, were challenged by the Crown and rejected because, I was told, they were professed anti-vaccinationists.
On the appointed day and hour, speaking in a very crowded court, counsel for the Crown opened the case against me, demonstrating clearly that in the pursuit of my own miserable ends I had sacrificed the life of a young, high-placed and lovely fellow-creature, and brought bereavement and desolation upon her husband and family.