Peacock; Garnett v.

Trelawny; McCarthy v.

Hogg, etc., etc.) Through the turbid atmosphere of their recriminations it is impossible to discern the whole personality of the man.

By careful comparison and refined manipulation of the biographical treasures at our disposal, a fair portrait of Shelley might still be set before the reader with the accuracy of a finished picture.

That labour of exquisite art and of devoted love still remains to be accomplished, though in the meantime Mr.W.M.