[The Ethics by Benedict de Spinoza]@TWC D-Link bookThe Ethics PART III 32/150
We should refer to the same category those objects, which affect us pleasurably or painfully, simply because they resemble other objects which affect us in the same way.
This I will show in the next Prop.
I am aware that certain authors, who were the first to introduce these terms "sympathy" and "antipathy," wished to signify thereby some occult qualities in things; nevertheless I think we may be permitted to use the same terms to indicate known or manifest qualities. PROP.XVI.
Simply from the fact that we conceive, that a given object has some point of resemblance with another object which is wont to affect the mind pleasurably or painfully, although the point of resemblance be not the efficient cause of the said emotions, we shall still regard the first--named object with love or hate. Proof .-- The point of resemblance was in the object (by hypothesis), when we regarded it with pleasure or pain, thus (III.
xiv.), when the mind is affected by the image thereof, it will straightway be affected by one or the other emotion, and consequently the thing, which we perceive to have the same point of resemblance, will be accidentally (III.
<<Back Index Next>> D-Link book Top TWC mobile books
|